<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Understanding Process of inequality &#8211; Conference on the Inequalities in Asia</title>
	<atom:link href="https://iiaconference2013.weaconferences.net/tag/understanding-process-of-inequality/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://iiaconference2013.weaconferences.net</link>
	<description>27th May to 12th July 2013</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Jun 2025 12:19:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-GB</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>Growth and Distribution Regimes in India after Independence</title>
		<link>https://iiaconference2013.weaconferences.net/papers/growth-and-distribution-regimes-in-india-after-independence/</link>
					<comments>https://iiaconference2013.weaconferences.net/papers/growth-and-distribution-regimes-in-india-after-independence/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[weaadmin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 May 2013 09:22:10 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Understanding Process of inequality]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://iiaconference2013.worldeconomicsassociation.org/?p=63</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[The Indian economy witnessed four qualitatively different regimes of capitalist growth and distribution since independence. The first two regimes in the period &#8211; 1951-1980 &#8211; operated under the hegemony of the Indian state, the third one under the mixed hegemony &#8230;<br /><a href="https://iiaconference2013.weaconferences.net/papers/growth-and-distribution-regimes-in-india-after-independence/">More &#8250;</a>]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Indian economy witnessed four qualitatively different regimes of capitalist growth and distribution since independence. The first two regimes in the period &#8211; 1951-1980 &#8211; operated under the hegemony of the Indian state, the third one under the mixed hegemony of the state and private capital (1980-1991), and the last one under the hegemony of private capital (1991-2012). These four regimes are associated with very different growth and distributional dynamics, roles of the State, and ended with crises of diverse kinds that then ushered in new regimes. The contribution of this paper is to show how Indian political economic history after independence is a patchwork of periods of short-lived stability that were in turn shaped, and produced by various crises and contingencies. It is certainly the case that through this entire period, even as economic growth has been achieved, there is an unmistakable emergence of private capital and professional classes as the dominant (without being hegemonic) classes that have become adept at using markets and the State to further their own interests. We argue that this dominance itself has come about through a series of contingent outcomes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://iiaconference2013.weaconferences.net/papers/growth-and-distribution-regimes-in-india-after-independence/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Tracing Some of the Distributional Consequences of Financial Reforms in India: 1991-2005</title>
		<link>https://iiaconference2013.weaconferences.net/papers/tracing-some-of-the-distributional-consequences-of-financial-reforms-in-india-1991-2005/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[weaadmin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 May 2013 09:22:10 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Understanding Process of inequality]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://iiaconference2013.worldeconomicsassociation.org/?p=67</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[This paper is a chapter from the author&#8217;s PHD thesis written in 2005. It examines the history of financial reforms in India up to 2005 and the consequences for the distribution of income and wealth. A short appendix provides a &#8230;<br /><a href="https://iiaconference2013.weaconferences.net/papers/tracing-some-of-the-distributional-consequences-of-financial-reforms-in-india-1991-2005/">More &#8250;</a>]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This paper is a chapter from the author&#8217;s PHD thesis written in 2005. It examines the history of financial reforms in India up to 2005 and the consequences for the distribution of income and wealth. A short appendix provides a very abbreviated discussion of the further changes from 2005-2012.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Impact of Technology on Wage Inequality: Evidence from Indian Manufacturing under Globalisation</title>
		<link>https://iiaconference2013.weaconferences.net/papers/impact-of-technology-on-wage-inequality-evidence-from-indian-manufacturing-under-globalisation/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[weaadmin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 May 2013 09:22:10 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Understanding Process of inequality]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://iiaconference2013.worldeconomicsassociation.org/?p=71</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[The policy reforms in India initiated in the early 1990s have brought phenomenal changes in the economy’s growth and development process. The economy during this period has experienced high growth rates on the one hand and increased inequalities on the &#8230;<br /><a href="https://iiaconference2013.weaconferences.net/papers/impact-of-technology-on-wage-inequality-evidence-from-indian-manufacturing-under-globalisation/">More &#8250;</a>]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The policy reforms in India initiated in the early 1990s have brought phenomenal changes in the economy’s growth and development process. The economy during this period has experienced high growth rates on the one hand and increased inequalities on the other hand. A prominent strand of literature argues that income inequalities are aggravated due to an increase in the earning opportunities of skilled workers over unskilled workers due to increased technology. Hence, the present paper is an attempt to examine the impact of various components of technology accessed through external as well as internal sources on changing wage structure in the era of globalization. The present study has been carried out using two data sources ASI and CMIE prowess during 1992-93 to 2005-06. From an analysis of the trends and patterns of employment and wages, it is observed that the wage share of skilled workers has been increasing during liberalisation period across all the manufacturing industries. Hence, to examine the wage inequality empirically, an econometric analysis of panel data has been carried out using a cost function framework. The results showed that technology intensity in general has a positive and significant effect on wage inequality in total manufacturing, high-tech and medium-tech industries. Further, it is found that while domestic technology elements have a positive effect on wage inequality in total manufacturing and high-tech industries; imported technology is significant in low-tech industries. While imported capital goods are significantly affecting the demand for skilled workers in low tech industries, domestic capital goods are contributing for the rise in skill demand in total manufacturing and high-tech industries. Thus, the study infers that domestic technology in general has been biased towards skilled workers there by contributing to increase in their wages.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Land Consolidation in China &#8211; A critical Review</title>
		<link>https://iiaconference2013.weaconferences.net/papers/land-consolidation-in-china-a-critical-review/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[weaadmin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 May 2013 08:57:19 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Understanding Process of inequality]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://iiaconference2013.worldeconomicsassociation.org/?p=59</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[China’s growth, after the early years, has been built on industrial development in a model of unbalanced growth. This has left the rural areas trailing urban areas in development. Rural residents earn less than urban residents, have inferior physical infrastructure, &#8230;<br /><a href="https://iiaconference2013.weaconferences.net/papers/land-consolidation-in-china-a-critical-review/">More &#8250;</a>]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>China’s growth, after the early years, has been built on industrial development in a model of unbalanced growth. This has left the rural areas trailing urban areas in development. Rural residents earn less than urban residents, have inferior physical infrastructure, and suffer poor basic amenities. These disparities have led to extensive rural-urban migration. This migration, by leaving residences unoccupied, has exacerbated inefficiencies in rural land use. The Chinese government correctly perceives the need to redress this challenge, and sees land consolidation as the appropriate approach not only to rationalize land use but also as an important component of rural development. This approach, together with a number of consolidation models, has been endorsed by many scholars. While we agree that reducing inefficiency in land use is an important policy objective in its own right, our review shows the current approach by the government suffers from major deficiencies</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Control of Agricultural Prices, Rural-Urban Migration and Primary Distribution: Reasons behind Inequality in China, 1978-2007</title>
		<link>https://iiaconference2013.weaconferences.net/papers/control-of-agricultural-prices-rural-urban-migration-and-primary-distribution-reasons-behind-inequality-in-china-1978-2007/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[weaadmin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 May 2013 08:51:26 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Understanding Process of inequality]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://iiaconference2013.worldeconomicsassociation.org/?p=55</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Most analyses explain the increase in China&#8217;s overall inequality during the reform period principally by means of the expansion of urban-rural income gap. This paper tries to shed light on a more complex relationship that appears to exist between primary &#8230;<br /><a href="https://iiaconference2013.weaconferences.net/papers/control-of-agricultural-prices-rural-urban-migration-and-primary-distribution-reasons-behind-inequality-in-china-1978-2007/">More &#8250;</a>]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Most analyses explain the increase in China&#8217;s overall inequality during the reform period principally by means of the expansion of urban-rural income gap. This paper tries to shed light on a more complex relationship that appears to exist between primary distribution of income, top income share, and the Gini index. This relationship is mediated by the same urban-rural disequalizing mechanism existing in the Chinese economy, which is based on the hukou system. After presenting the main theoretical contributions that clarify the general relationship among those three variables, we describe that mechanism which has connected them in China during three last decades. As we shall see, there exists a link between the relative impoverishment of Chinese peasants, due to declining agricultural prices, the consequent flow of rural-urban migration, its depressive effect on industrial wages, the resulting increase in the profits’ share, and rising top incomes. The enrichment of urban top income households drives the increase in the urban-rural gap, while labour’s loss of share in national income ultimately accounts for the overall increase in the Gini index. The paper ends with a reflection on the ability of the latest policy measures taken by the Chinese government to reverse this pattern of inequality during the current global economic crisis.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Profit-Led Growth and Policy-Induced Changes in Income Distribution in a Developing Economy</title>
		<link>https://iiaconference2013.weaconferences.net/papers/profit-led-growth-and-policy-induced-changes-in-income-distribution-in-a-developing-economy/</link>
					<comments>https://iiaconference2013.weaconferences.net/papers/profit-led-growth-and-policy-induced-changes-in-income-distribution-in-a-developing-economy/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[weaadmin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 May 2013 08:48:16 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Understanding Process of inequality]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://iiaconference2013.worldeconomicsassociation.org/?p=51</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In a demand-side growth model we show that a developing economy may experi- ence a steady positive equilibrium growth rate of investment and profit as long as – investment in the economy is responsive to the aspirations of the richer &#8230;<br /><a href="https://iiaconference2013.weaconferences.net/papers/profit-led-growth-and-policy-induced-changes-in-income-distribution-in-a-developing-economy/">More &#8250;</a>]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In a demand-side growth model we show that a developing economy may experi- ence a steady positive equilibrium growth rate of investment and profit as long as – investment in the economy is responsive to the aspirations of the richer section of the population to match the consumption level of the developed world and imita- tion of foreign production technology is not very expensive. A worsening of income distribution is not required to sustain this kind of growth process but a sufficiently unequal initial distribution of income is enough to propel it. We also show that the technologically dynamic sector producing for the rich is incapable in generating much employment. If the process is accompanied by no change in the distribution of income then the employment share of the the technologically stagnant sector producing for the poor increases at the cost of declining growth rate of real wage. In case the growth process is accompanied by an exogenous change in the distribution of income induced by shifts in economic policy regime then the positive and stable equilibrium growth rate of investment is associated with an increasing growth rate of output though more is gained in terms of increase in output growth when income distribution improves rather than worsens. On the other hand, growth rate of employment for the entire economy might decline.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://iiaconference2013.weaconferences.net/papers/profit-led-growth-and-policy-induced-changes-in-income-distribution-in-a-developing-economy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
